feat(wasix): add first-class Bun and Deno support - #139
Merged
Conversation
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Why
The portable WASIX TypeScript SDK had first-class browser and Node surfaces, but Bun and Deno depended on incidental Node compatibility and had no explicit runtime contracts. Both runtimes can consume npm packages directly, so a second JSR publication path adds release complexity without a distinct product capability.
Impact
Consumers get explicit Bun and Deno support from
@oliphaunt/wasix-tson npm. Deno usesnpm:@oliphaunt/wasix-ts, matching the npm-only model for@oliphaunt/ts. Existing browser and Node exports remain supported.Validation
moon run sdk-contracts:check oliphaunt-js:package oliphaunt-wasix-ts:package(22 tasks passed)git diff --checkStack
This PR is intentionally based on #129 and should be reviewed/merged after that base PR.