[rig-claude] Improve Claude dynamic-workflow compatibility for rig

[github-actions]

Compatibility gap addressed

The Anthropic engine example in skills/rig/references/claude-workflow-conversion.md contained a broken code snippet:

// Per-call model override — equivalent to { model: "claude-opus-4-5" } in a dynamic workflow:
const result = await call(classifier, { text }, { model: "claude-opus-4-5" });

call and text were never imported or defined, making the example fail at a glance and misleading anyone trying to port a Claude dynamic workflow that uses per-call model overrides (a common pattern: agent(prompt, { model: "claude-opus-4-5" })).

Why this improves transfer from Claude dynamic workflows to Rig

Per-call model selection ({ model: "..." }) is listed in the primitive mapping table as a 1-to-1 correspondence, but the only runnable example was broken. A Claude dynamic-workflow author who lands on this section expecting to understand how to swap models would see an immediately non-compiling snippet.

The fix replaces the bare await call(...) with a complete workflow({ body: async ({ call, input }) => ... }) that:

• compiles correctly
• demonstrates the idiomatic rig pattern (call destructured from body)
• preserves the pedagogical point (per-call model override)

Files changed

• skills/rig/references/claude-workflow-conversion.md — Fixed the broken Anthropic model override example to be a complete, self-contained workflow

Validation run

Only a documentation file changed; no code or tests were modified. Per the task's validation rules, no build/test command is required for docs-only changes. Links in the file were verified to be unchanged.

Remaining intentional differences

None introduced by this change. The existing behavioral differences section in the doc remains accurate.

Generated by Daily Rig Claude Dynamic Workflow Compatibility · sonnet46 57.3 AIC · ⌖ 7.92 AIC · ⊞ 5.4K · ◷

[github-actions]

🧠 Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer has completed the skills-based review. ✅

[github-actions]

Skills-Based Review 🧠

Applied /codebase-design — approving. The fix is correct and well-scoped.

📋 Summary

What was fixed

The broken await call(classifier, { text }, { model: ... }) snippet (where call and text were undefined) is replaced with a complete, self-contained workflow({ ... body: async ({ call, input }) => ... }) that compiles correctly and matches the idiomatic rig pattern.

Positive highlights

• ✅ The fix is minimal and surgical — only the broken code block is changed
• ✅ The replacement uses the correct idiomatic pattern (call destructured from body, input.text for the typed field)
• ✅ The pedagogical point (per-call model override) is preserved
• ✅ PR description accurately describes the problem and the fix

No blocking issues found.

🧠 Reviewed using Matt Pocock's skills by Matt Pocock Skills Reviewer · sonnet46 14.5 AIC · ⌖ 4.08 AIC · ⊞ 6.3K
_{Comment /matt to run again}